System and method for routing and specifying print jobs utilizing product characteristics

ABSTRACT

A scoring and weighting system and method for providing print device selection on the basis of product characteristics that are specified for a print product is provided. The system determines the properties of one or more printing devices in relation to the product characteristics. The printing devices have one or more print mediums for providing the print product. A score is derived by determining a status respecting the conformity of the one or more print mediums to the product characteristics and evaluating the one or more printing devices&#39; properties. Associating that score with each of the one or more printing device. Also, associating the print product with a print job and utilizing the score to route the print job to one of the one or more printing devices to produce the print product on one of the one or more print mediums.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No.61/540,393, filed Sep. 28, 2011.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is directed to a scoring/weighting methodology forrouting print jobs to print queues, specifying print mediums on thebasis of print product characteristics, and for determining if a givenproduct can be produced by a given lab. A system and method are providedfor determining and assigning a score/weighting to printer devices byevaluating the ability of said device to adequately, efficiently andcost effectively produce the printed material according to specifiedproduct characteristics, such as whether the printer has an appropriatetype of paper loaded or available. The scoring process encompassesdevice evaluation, print medium availability and accessibilityinquiries, as well as manipulation of the product and productspecifications. The present invention provides automated decision makingto the process of printing digital images or producing products.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The production of image prints in varying sizes continues to enjoy asignificant demand despite the various devices that are available todayfor people to electronically view and enjoy images. Coupled with thatdemand is the need for print product providers, not only to fulfill therequests and specifications of customers, but to also be able to do soto the satisfaction of the customer and in an efficient, cost effectivemanner.

To address this issue, a number of printing programs, devices andmachines have evolved over the years. Many such solutions include a widevariety of printing capabilities, thus enabling customers to specifyvarying end product characteristics. Such characteristics might includeprint sizes, print finishes—glossy or non-glossy, and so on. Associatedwith such characteristics is the need for special purpose printingdevices and special purpose or appropriately sized mediums, such asphoto paper. As such, a photo-finisher may have multiple print devices,with each device having the ability to handle and/or internally stockvarying print medium formats and sizes.

In order to fulfill a print request, it is necessary for the appropriatedevice and medium to be selected. In many situations, this process mayinclude software programs that essentially make the appropriateselections for the operator. This option ensures that the proper mediumand most efficient photo paper sizes, for example, are selected in orderto maximize the number of photographs that can be generated for thecustomer specified size characteristic. A problem generally arises when,for example, the print device to which a product job has been sent, runsout of the appropriate sized paper (e.g., 6 inch or 8 inch paper), orthe device is not capable of handling the characteristics associatedwith the particular product. In this situation, the operator, ifavailable, must then reload the printer or reassign the print job.However, if the paper size is not immediately available to the operatoror the operator is not physically present, the entire operations forthat fulfillment center will come to a halt. This can be particularlyproblematic when dealing with a fulfillment center that is handlingseveral hundreds of orders.

What is needed is an automatic methodology by which the delay can betotally abated, irrespective of the immediate availability of the“correct” sized paper, without operator intervention. Print jobs shouldbe re-routable to other devices, and alternate paper selections shouldbe possible in order to achieve the same end result, without productwaste. Even further, means by which the most efficient, capable, andproperly stocked print devices for a given product characteristic, couldbe selected at the onset would be highly advantageous.

Accordingly there is a need for an efficient, scalable, user friendlyand robust technique for assigning jobs to print device queues based onthe characteristics of the products involved in each of the jobs. Thepresent invention fills these needs as well as other needs.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is directed to a scoring and weighting method forproviding asynchronous print device selection on the basis of productcharacteristics that are specified for a print product. The methodcomprises determining in real time capabilities of one or more printingdevices in connection with the product characteristics of a job, whereinthe printing devices may have one or more print mediums for providingthe print product. In another aspect, the present invention derives ascore by determining a status respecting the conformity of the one ormore print mediums to the product characteristics and evaluates the oneor more printing devices' properties and the one or more print mediums'status. In a further aspect, the score is associated with each of theone or more printing devices. In yet another aspect, the print productis associated with a print job and the score is utilized to route theprint job initially to one of the one or more printing devices toproduce the print product on one of the one or more print mediums.Thereafter the job may be routed to another printing device or anothermedium within the initial printing device. The weighting may beoverridden by an operator and is also impacted by operator inputregarding the availability or not of a particular print medium.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The above-mentioned and other features and advantages of this invention,and the manner of attaining them, will become apparent and be betterunderstood by reference to the following description of the invention inconjunction with the accompanying drawing, wherein:

FIG. 1 is a block diagram generally illustrating various components thatmay be utilized for the implementation of some aspects of the presentinvention;

FIG. 2A is a flow chart illustrating a scoring methodology for providinga base score, which may be implemented in the present invention;

FIG. 2B is a continuation of the flow chart of FIG. 2A;

FIG. 3 is a flow chart illustrating a further aspect of the presentinvention wherein the scoring of FIGS. 2A and 2B are fine tuned by theintroduction of additional scoring and finally the entry of the scoresinto a data store;

FIG. 4 is flow chart generally illustrating a procedure for printingutilizing the scoring methodology of the present invention; and

FIG. 5 is a block diagram generally illustrating a computing environmentin which the invention may be implemented.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Generally, the systems and methods described herein for providing andimplementing a scoring scheme to thereby allocate product print jobs todevices in relation to the characteristic of the print product may beimplemented in hardware, software or a combination thereof, and may bedistributed across a variety of computing devices.

This document is organized as follows. In the first section, an overviewof the techniques and implementation is provided and described withreference to some component devices and embodiment of the invention. Inthe next section, an exemplary algorithm for providing a base scoringaspect of the present invention is discussed. Following this, an exampleof providing additional scoring or further tuning of the base scoring isdiscussed. Next, an illustrative operational function of the presentinvention is presented and described. Finally, an exemplary computerenvironment for the implementation and use of the invention isdescribed.

The present invention provides a system and method to enable a previewof a print product in order to determine among other things, thecharacteristics of the desired product, the level of difficulty requiredto achieve the end result, and the best suited device for delivering theproduct, given other external circumstance or situations relating to theproduct delivery device. A scheme of scoring production devices enablesan optimization, matching and assignment of the best device, to producerequired product.

The present invention is described with reference to equipment andprocesses relating to photography and more specifically, the productionof photo related products by the printing of images onto paper toproduce an image print, or on calendars, mugs, photo books, blankets,clothing, jewelry, mouse pads, puzzles, and the like, in the photoordering and fulfillment process. However, as would be appreciated byone skilled in the art, the invention may be applicable to otherprocesses and implementations, the references and discussion providedherein are strictly for illustrative purposes and are not intended tolimit the scope of the invention. For example, the present inventionwould be applicable to fields in which one or more end-products havevery specific characteristics and there is a need to decide among avariety of means for producing such products. Such fields may includetooling operations where end product characteristics may be fed toseveral CNC machines, or include other collections of renderingequipment which may be selectable to provide an output on the basis ofbest fit for a specified set of output product characteristics.

Referring to the drawings, and initially to FIG. 1, a print processingand fulfillment system is provided and is identified as reference number100. In general, the system 100 is configured for providing prints ofimages according to criteria that may have been specified by a user ofsystem 100, such as a customer. The system 100 may include acommunication network 101, such as a Local Area Network (LAN), Wide AreaNetwork (WAN), Wireless network or other similar configuration forallowing communication among two or more computing devices. Connected tothe network 101 may be a personal computer 102 or other computing devicethat is configured to communicate with a server 104 and one or moreimage printing devices 106A, 106B, 108 and 110. Computing device 102includes devices such as handheld devices, laptop computers or personalcomputers, which may be located in a home, office, retail location orother environment, and that provide an interface for user interactionwith local or remote applications or systems. Computing device 102 maybe a wireless device such as a cellular phone or personal digitalassistant. A server 104 as used herein may be utilized to provide anyone or more of a variety of functions including serving as a web server,data store, print spooler, print queue, an application server and/orprovide other services. The printing devices 106A and 106B may beidentical printers that handle specific product types, for example 4×6and 5×7 photo prints. The duplication of equipment may be due to thefact that perhaps 4×6 prints are the most demanded productspecifications or for whatever reason. A second printing device variety108 is provided, which may be capable of handling 4×6, 8×10 and 16×20prints. These devices may all be co-located with a first fulfillmentcenter 112A. A second fulfillment center 112B may be remotely locatedand connected to the network 101. Each fulfillment center 112A, 112B,may have its own local area network and local server in addition toother devices for fulfilling user orders. Alternatively and as shown,fulfillment center 112B may just provide remote printing capabilitiesvia printing device 110. As shown, the computer 102, data store 104 andprinters 106A, 106B and 108 may all be located in one facility or atleast in very close geographic proximity identified as reference number112A. Printer 110 may be remotely located whereby it is accessible by aWide Area Network, the internet or similar portion of the communicationlink 101, as identified by reference number 112B. Printer 110 may beconfigured to communicate with the computer 102 and server 104.

Customers place orders for photographic prints and specify any number ofcharacteristics for each of the prints. A customer as used herein refersto one who originates an order for printed photographic images at aprocessing or fulfillment center 112A, 112B. The customer may utilizeelectronic means for delivery of the images or may physical deliverphotographic film, in either case, the customer initiates arequest/order for a finished product such as picture prints. With thatorder, the customer would specify print sizes, type of finish, etc.—product characteristics.

The fulfillment center 112A, 112B or order processor can be defined asthe entity that acts upon the orders placed by the customer. Thefulfillment center 112A, 112B may provide the end product to thecustomer either directly or through the partner provider. In this case,the focus is on print products and their characteristics, along with thecapabilities of the printing devices 106A, 106B, 108 and 110 that are atthe disposal of the fulfillment centers 112A and 112B. An appropriateprinter, with the right capabilities speed, paper, etc. must be selectedto perform the job and meet the customer's requirements.

An aspect of the present invention relates to a scoring process andcomponent whereby an appropriate printer device may be selected or beotherwise assigned. The advantages thereof can be further appreciated byconsidering the representative implementation of the scoring processillustrated in FIGS. 2A and 2B. With reference to FIGS. 2A and 2B, alogic flow diagram 200 for assigning a base score to the printingdevices is illustrated. At step 202, the system 100 receives forprinting, unique sets of product characteristics, i.e., customer orderswith specific requirements. For example, the system may have received arequest to print 4×6 photos and is first evaluating printer 106A for itssuitability or readiness to perform the job order and thereby producethe product.

At step 204, the system will first determine the ability of printer 106Ato produce the product with the unique set of product characteristicsusing the device's 106A currently loaded papers. In this example, 4×6prints are set up by default to go onto 6 inch paper. Thus, adetermination is made as to whether printer 106A has 4 inch or 6 inchrolls of paper loaded. If the result of that inquiry is in theaffirmative, meaning that there is an appropriate roll to enableprinting of 4×6 prints (i.e., 6 inch paper is loader in the printer),printer 106A will be assigned a score of 100 at step 206 and processingwill resume at step 242 to consider the next unique set of productcharacteristics either for the same order set of for another order by adifferent customer. If on the other hand, 4 inch paper is loaded in theprinter, a score of 400 would be attributed to the printer 106A.Orientation for printing is important because the number of prints perhour of a printer is higher for prints on 6 inch paper than for thosesame prints on 4 inch paper. Conversely, if here is no appropriate paperroll loaded, another inquiry ensues at step 208, where a determinationis made about whether the product characteristics can be printed withthe force output rule for printer 106A. So for example, say thecharacteristic that was specified by the customer is to print the new4½×6 usually specified for digital cameras rather than 4×6. Since theprinter 106 does not have that size paper (maybe it only has a 4 inchpaper roll as opposed to the 6 inch paper roll), it may be possible toforce the printer 106A to print the image onto the 4 inch roll paper.Returning to the flow diagram 200, if the determination of step 208 istrue, (i.e., the printout can be forced), then printer 106A would beassigned a score of 200, at step 210, and processing will resume withstep 242 for the next unique set of product characteristics. If printcould not be forced then the system checks to see if the productcharacteristic can be printed with the currently available paper for theprinter 106A. In other words, a determination is made as to whether a 6inch roll, or whatever other size is specified, is available in thefulfillment center's stock room. If so, the printer is assigned a scoreof 300, at step 214, if 6 inch roll paper is available. The response tothis inquiry may be provided by an end user or by querying a stockinventory system. Here after also, processing resumes with step 242. Ifthe 6 inch roll is not available in stock, the system checks to see atstep 216, if the product characteristics can be printed with other paperthat is currently loaded in the printer 106A, if the job were to berotated. So for example, a determination is made as to whether the jobbe printed on the 4 inch roll that is loaded, by rotating the images. Ifindeed 4 inch paper is loaded and it is possible to obtain the printoutby rotating the job, the printer 106A is assigned a score of 400, atstep 218 and processing exits to step 242. This inquiry and scoreassignment or processing of the next set of unique productcharacteristics at step 242, continues in a similar manner withdifferent scores being assigned for different evaluations according tothe following scheme:

Step 220, evaluate if there is paper available in stock that will allowprinting if the job is rotated, and if so assign a score of 500 at step222 (i.e., in the current example if only a 4 inch roll is available, ascore of 500 applies);

Step 224, evaluate if characteristics can be printed with the device'scurrently loaded paper if the job is printed on a larger size (e.g., 5×7paper that is loaded in printer 106), and if so assign a score of 600,at step 226. However, it should be noted that a product is not deemedproducible by a store if the product would have to be printed on largersized paper.

Step 228, evaluate if characteristics can be printed with stockavailable paper if the job is printed on a larger size, and if so assigna score of 700, at step 230;

Step 232, evaluate if characteristics can be printed with currentlyloaded larger size paper if the job is rotated, and if so assign a scoreof 800 at step 234; and

Step 236, evaluate if characteristics can be printed with stockavailable larger sized paper if the job is rotated, and if so assign ascore of 900 at step 238.

Invariably, if after processing steps 204 through 238, the response toeach and every one of the inquiries is negative, the system willindicate at step 240 that the device is unable to print that particularunique set of product characteristics, and will then assign a score of999. In other words, at this point, for example, it would be determinedthat printer 106A could not provide a printout for the criteriaspecified by the customer. Conversely, if a score is assigned for acharacteristic that score is registered in the data store 104 for allmatching entries of that product characteristic.

Processing would then continue for the same printer 106A for the nextset of unique product characteristics, at step 242. This process isrepeated for each printer device 106A, 1068, 108 and 110, therebyproviding a score for each device in association with every set ofunique product characteristics, for each product that has not yet beenprinted. It should be appreciated that the scoring scheme is variableand flexible, whereby any particular criteria or option may be weighteddifferently depending on what would achieve the best business oreconomic model for the fulfillment center. For example, in theillustrated and described scheme, it is preferable as indicated by thelower score number, to rotate a job at step 216 than it is to print thejob on larger paper at step 224. This may not always be the desiredoutcome and the present invention thus allows a change to be made bymerely reassigning different score values to each affected option.

In another aspect of the present invention, an operator can force asuitable score in order to allow a particular printer to become thechosen printer. In other words, the ability for a flexible override ofthe system operation in another aspect of the inventive system.

In a further aspect of the present invention, one or more supplementalvalues may also be added to or subtracted from the base score that wasdetermined in the foregoing steps 204 to 240. This fine tuning orrefining aspect of the invention is best described with reference toFIG. 3, wherein the logic flow 300 for evaluating if a print process maybe interrupted is illustrated. Logic flow 300 is preferably initiatedgiven a unique set of product characteristics and a base score asprovided by flow 200. Processing begins at step 302 with an evaluationregarding whether a print device is busy and if the current job forwhich a printer is being sought, has been designated a high priority. Ifone or the other of these is not true (i.e., the device is not busyand/or the job is not a high priority), then processing will cease atstep 303. In this case, the base score is entered into the data store104. Conversely, if both inquiries are true, a further inquiry is madeat step 304, to determine if the device supports interruption of acurrently running batch of prints. If the device supports interruptionof the current batch, a supplemental value of forty (40) is added to thebase score at step 306. Alternatively, if the device does not supportinterruption of the currently executing batch, then a supplemental valueof sixty (60) is added to the base score at step 308. At step 310, alist of items corresponding to the unique set of product characteristicsis obtained, for example, from server 104. Then, for each item in thelist with an entry for the currently evaluated device that is found inthe database, the score and product characteristic in the data table areupdated, at step 312, with the new or updated score value, i.e., basescore plus 40 or 60 as the case may be. Finally, at step 314, for eachitem in the list that is without an entry in the database, for thecurrently evaluated printing device 106A, 106B, 108 and 110, theevaluated score and product characteristic are inserted into the itemrecord.

In a further aspect of the present invention, the score values arethemselves utilized as keys to provide an indication of priority, aboveand beyond the contribution of the score to the total score that isderived for a printing device. More specifically and continuing with theprevious example, consider a first device having a base score 500 thatalso supports interruption of the current batch, and a second devicehaving a base score 300 that does not support interruption of thecurrent batch. The first device will end up with a score of 540 and thesecond device will end up with a score of 360. In this aspect of theinvention, the first device that has the key value 40 within its score,i.e. a four in the tenths position, will have a higher priority than thesecond device which has a 6 in the same position. This is despite thefact that the second device has an overall lower total score.

In operation, and as more readily understood with reference to FIG. 4,the present invention utilizes the score value in the print sequence400. The score process of flows 200, 300 and the print sequence 400 mayoccur and operate asynchronously. Even further, the print sequence logic400 may be executing for multiple print devices 106A, 106B, 108 and 110at the same time. Hence, one aspect of the present invention enablesasynchronous, parallel processing of print jobs and queues, based onprint product characteristics, and provide means to communicate amongand between the asynchronous processes. The sequence 400 is performedfor each device 106A, 106B, 108 and 110 within the system 100. At step402, the next product in a product print list is obtained. If there isno product in the product print list, processing branches to step 416 toaddress the printer device's print list. If there is a product in theproduct print list, processing continues to step 404 where adetermination is made about whether that particular product is alreadybeing printed by another device. This aspect supports the asynchronousprocessing of the present invention. If the product is being printed byanother device, the program loops back to step 402 to look for the nextproduct within the product print list. Conversely, if the product is notbeing printed by some print device, then an inquiry is made at step 406to determine if the paper that is associated with the device'sregistration to print this job is currently loaded in the printer. Ifthe paper is not loaded, processing exits and loops back to step 402. Ifthe paper is loaded as determined at step 406, processing continues tostep 408 to determine if all printer devices in the system 100 haveregistered for the particular product. Since not all evaluation ofprinter devices may have been completed at this instant, thisverification is provided. If they have not, the process loops back againto step 402, for the next product in the product print list.Alternatively, at step 410, if the all the devices have registered, thesystem evaluates if the current print device actually has the lowestscore for the particular product under consideration. If the currentprint device does have the lowest score, then the product is added atstep 412 to a list of items that can be printed by the device 106A,106B, 108 and 110 (i.e., the device print list), then processing loopsback to step 402. However, if the current print device does not have thelowest score, a further evaluation is conducted at step 414 to see ifthe product is already locked by the current device. If the product islocked by the current device then processing shifts to step 412, wherethe product is added to the device's print list. Otherwise processingreturns to step 402 to consider the next product in the product printlist. As stated earlier, with each evaluation at step 402, if there areno other products in the product print list, processing moves to step416 to handle the device's print list.

At step 416, if there are no items in the device print list, processingexits. Conversely, if there are devices in the list, the list is sortedat step 418. An attempt to obtain a product from the list takes place atstep 420. If there is no product to obtain, then processing exits.However, if there is a product, an attempt is made to send the productto the printer device at step 422. Steps 420-422 repeat in a loop untilthere are no further products in the device print list. Alternatively,step 416 may be automatically triggered by the addition of products to adevice's product list. Similarly, other aspects of the processesdescribed herein may be programmed to respond to events as opposed tooperating sequentially. The failure of a print device 106A, 106B, 108and 110 to successfully produce a print product or completed a joborder, for example in the cases of running out of paper, may trigger theinitiating step 202 of the process flow 200 whereby another device wouldbe designated to complete the job.

Having described the system and method of the present invention and anembodiment thereof, an exemplary computer environment for implementingthe described design and execution is presented next.

FIG. 5 shows an exemplary computing environment 500 that can be used toimplement any of the processing thus far described. Computingenvironment 500 may include one or more computers 512 (such as computingdevice 102) comprising a system bus 524 that couples a video interface526, network interface 528, a keyboard/mouse interface 534, and a systemmemory 536 to a Central Processing Unit (CPU) 538. A monitor or display540 is connected to bus 524 by video interface 526 and provides the userwith a graphical user interface to view, edit, and prepare a print orderusing digitally represented still images. The graphical user interfaceallows the user to enter commands and information into computer 512using a keyboard 541 and a user interface selection device 543, such asa mouse, touch screen, or other pointing device. Keyboard 541 and userinterface selection device are connected to bus 524 throughkeyboard/mouse interface 534. The display 540 and user interfaceselection device 543 are used in combination to form the graphical userinterface which allows the user to implement at least a portion of thepresent invention. Other peripheral devices may be connected to theremote computer through universal serial bus (USB) drives 545 totransfer information to and from computer 512. For example, cameras andcamcorders may be connected to computer 512 through serial port 532 orUSB drives 545 so that data representative of a digitally representedstill image or video may be downloaded to system memory 536 or anothermemory storage device associated with computer 512 such that the imagesmay be subsequently printed by one or more fulfillment centers 112 inaccordance with the present invention.

The system memory 536 is also connected to bus 524 and may include readonly memory (ROM), random access memory (RAM), an operating system 544,a basic input/output system (BIOS) 546, application programs 548 andprogram data 550. The computer 512 may further include a hard disk drive552 for reading from and writing to a hard disk, a magnetic disk drive554 for reading from and writing to a removable magnetic disk (e.g.,floppy disk), and an optical disk drive 556 for reading from and writingto a removable optical disk (e.g., CD ROM or other optical media). Thecomputer 512 may also include USB drives 545 and other types of drivesfor reading from and writing to flash memory devices (e.g., compactflash, memory stick/PRO and DUO, SD card, multimedia card, smart mediaxD card), and a scanner 558 for scanning items such as still imagephotographs to be downloaded to computer 512. A hard disk driveinterface 552 a, magnetic disk drive interface 554 a, an optical driveinterface 556 a, a USB drive interface 545 a, and a scanner interface558 a operate to connect bus 524 to hard disk drive 552, magnetic diskdrive 554, optical disk drive 556, USB drive 545 and scanner 558,respectively. Each of these drive components and their associatedcomputer-readable media may provide remote computer 512 withnon-volatile storage of computer-readable instruction, program modules,data structures, application programs, an operating system, and otherdata for computer 512. In addition, it will be understood that computer512 may also utilize other types of computer-readable media in additionto those types set forth herein, such as digital video disks, randomaccess memory, read only memory, other types of flash memory cards,magnetic cassettes, and the like.

Computer 512 may operate in a networked environment using logicalconnections with fulfillment centers 112A, 112B. Network interface 528provides a communication path 560 between bus 524 and network 101, whichallows, for example, a print order to be communicated through network101 from photo service provider to fulfillment centers 112A, 112B afterthe print order has been established, and optionally saved in a memory.This type of logical network connection is commonly used in conjunctionwith a local area network (LAN). The print order may also becommunicated from bus 524 through a communication path 562 to network102 using serial port 532 and a modem 564. Using a modem connectionbetween the computer 512 and fulfillment center 112A, 1128 is commonlyused in conjunction with a wide area network (WAN). It will beappreciated that the network connections shown herein are merelyexemplary, and it is within the scope of the present invention to useother types of network connections between remote computer 512 andfulfillment centers 112A, 1126 including both wired and wirelessconnections.

From the foregoing, it will be seen that this invention is one welladapted to attain all the ends and objects hereinabove set forthtogether with other advantages which are obvious and which are inherentto the method and apparatus. It will be understood that certain featuresand sub combinations are of utility and may be employed withoutreference to other features and sub combinations. This is contemplatedby and is within the scope of the claims. Since many possibleembodiments of the invention may be made without departing from thescope thereof, it is also to be understood that all matters herein setforth or shown in the accompanying drawings are to be interpreted asillustrative and not limiting.

The constructions described above and illustrated in the drawings arepresented by way of example only and are not intended to limit theconcepts and principles of the present invention. As used herein, theterms “having” and/or “including” and other terms of inclusion are termsindicative of inclusion rather than requirement.

While the invention has been described with reference to preferredembodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art thatvarious changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted forelements thereof to adapt to particular situations without departingfrom the scope of the invention. Therefore, it is intended that theinvention not be limited to the particular embodiments disclosed as thebest mode contemplated for carrying out this invention, but that theinvention will include all embodiments falling within the scope andspirit of the appended claims.

What is claimed is:
 1. A system for selecting an image printing devicefor producing a product based on one or more characteristics of theproduct selected by a user, the system comprising: one or more imageprinting devices; one or more print mediums for use in said one or moreimage printing devices; a user specification component; and a scoringcomponent adapted to establish a score value for each of said one ormore image printing devices, wherein said one or more image printingdevices is adapted to utilize at least one of said one or more printmediums for producing the product, wherein said user specificationcomponent is operable to enable the user to specify the one or morecharacteristics of the product that will be provided on said one or moreprint mediums, wherein said score value for each of said one or moreimage printing devices is representative of the suitability of each ofsaid one or more image printing devices to produce the product havingthe one or more characteristics of the product, wherein said scoringcomponent establishes said score value for each of said one or moreimage printing devices based at least in part on the availability ofsaid one or more print mediums for use in each of said one or more imageprinting devices to produce the product, and wherein said score value isutilized to select an appropriate one of said one or more image printingdevices to produce the product.
 2. A system in accordance with claim 1,wherein said appropriate one of said one or more image printing devicesto produce the product is based on said one or more image printingdevices having the lowest score value.
 3. A system in accordance withclaim 1, wherein said score value is a base score, wherein said scoringcomponent is adapted to subsequently either add or subtract one or moresupplemental values to said base score based on an additional criteria,wherein the sum of said base score and said one or more supplementalvalues is equal to an updated score, and wherein a portion of saidupdated score is utilized to select an appropriate one of said one ormore image printing devices to produce the product notwithstanding saidupdate score.
 4. A system in accordance with claim 3, wherein saidadditional criteria relates to whether each of said one or more imageprinting devices support interruption of the production of the product.5. A system in accordance with claim 1, wherein the product is selectedfrom the group consisting of an image print, calendar, mug, photo book,blanket, clothing, jewelry, mouse pad, and puzzle.
 6. A system inaccordance with claim 5, wherein the product is an image print, andwherein one of said one or more characteristics of the product is aprint size for said image print.
 7. A system in accordance with claim 5,wherein the product is an image print, and wherein one of said one ormore characteristics of the product is a print finish of said imageprint.
 8. A system in accordance with claim 1, wherein said one or moreprint mediums are one or more rolls of print paper, wherein each of saidone or more rolls of print paper have different sizes.
 9. A system inaccordance with claim 8, wherein said scoring component establishes saidscore value based at least in part on a comparison of said one or morecharacteristics of the product and the size of each of said one or morerolls of print paper that are available in each of said one or moreimage printing devices.
 10. A system in accordance with claim 1, whereinsaid scoring component establishes said score value based at least inpart on a comparison of said one or more characteristics of the productand an orientation of each of said one or more print mediums that areavailable in each of said one or more image printing devices.
 11. Ascoring and weighting method for selecting one or more image printingdevices for producing a print product, the method comprising:identifying one or more characteristics for the print product; providingsaid one or more image printing devices that are configured forproducing the print product using one or more print mediums; determiningan ability of each of said one or more image printing devices to producethe print product including said one or more characteristics using saidone or more print mediums; establishing a score value for each one ofthe one or more image printing devices based on said one or morecharacteristics and said ability of said one or more image printingdevices to produce the print product; associating the print product witha print job; and utilizing said score value to route and prioritize saidprint job to one of said one or more image printing devices to producethe print product using one of said one or more print mediums.
 12. Amethod in accordance with claim 11, wherein said one or more imageprinting devices with lowest score value is used to produce the printproduct.
 13. A method in accordance with claim 11, wherein saidestablishing of said score value comprises assigning a base score toeach of said one or more image printing devices and subsequently addingor subtracting one or more supplemental values based on an additionalcriteria, wherein the sum of the base score and said one or moresupplemental values is equal to an updated score, and wherein a portionof said updated score is utilized to route and prioritize said print jobto one of said one or more image printing devices to produce the printproduct notwithstanding said update score.
 14. A method in accordancewith claim 13, wherein said additional criteria relates to whether eachof said one or more image printing devices supports interruption of theproduction of the print product.
 15. A method in accordance with claim11, wherein the print product is selected from the group consisting ofan image print, calendar, mug, photo book, blanket, clothing, jewelry,mouse pad, and puzzle.
 16. A method in accordance with claim 15, whereinthe print product is an image print, and wherein said one or morecharacteristic of the print product is a print size for said imageprint.
 17. A method in accordance with claim 15, wherein the printproduct is an image print, and wherein said one or more characteristicof the print product is a print finish of said image print.
 18. A methodin accordance with claim 11, wherein said score value is establishedbased at least in part on a comparison of said one or morecharacteristics of the print product and a size of said one or moreprint mediums that are available in each of said one or more imageprinting devices.
 19. A method in accordance with claim 11, wherein saidscore value is established based at least in part on a comparison ofsaid one or more characteristics of the print product and an orientationof said one or more print mediums that are available in each of said oneor more image printing devices.
 20. A method in accordance with claim11, further comprising allowing a customer to select said one or morecharacteristics for the print product.
 21. A non-transitory computerreadable medium having thereon computer executable instructions forperforming a scoring and weighting method for selecting one or moreimage printing devices for producing a print product, the methodcomprising: identifying one or more characteristics for the printproduct; providing said one or more image printing devices that areconfigured for producing the print product using one or more printmediums; determining an ability of each of said one or more imageprinting devices to produce the print product including said one or morecharacteristics using said one or more print mediums; establishing ascore value for each one of the one or more image printing devices usinga computing device, wherein said score value is based on said one ormore characteristics and said ability of said one or more image printingdevices to produce the print product; associating the print product witha print job; and utilizing said score value to route and prioritize saidprint job to one of said one or more image printing devices to producethe print product using one of said one or more print mediums.